La Russophobe has moved!

You should be automatically redirected in 6 seconds. If not, visit
and update your bookmarks.

Take action now to save Darfur

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Another International Evaluation, Another Pathetic Failing Grade for Putin's Russia

Reporters Without Borders has released its latest ranking of countries according to the amount of freedom they allow to the press.

Once again, Russia has received a barbaric failing score -- it ranks 144th out of 169 countries surveyed, the bottom 10% of all countries in the world, surrounded (and exceeded) by banana republics like Swaziland, Gambia, Nigeria and Sudan. Yes, that's right, Sudan has a higher score for press freedom than neo-Soviet Russia!

RWB states
: "We have witnessed widespread violence targeting journalists, and actually impunity for those who take journalists as their targets." Moreover, "there is no possibility for the opposition to access national TV and national radio, except on Ekho Moskvy," which reaches only part of the population. It concludes: "Russia is not progressing. Anna Politkovskaya’s murder in October 2006, the failure to punish those responsible for murdering journalists, and the still glaring lack of diversity in the media, especially the broadcast media, weighed heavily in the evaluation of press freedom in Russia."

The report notes that all the other G-8 members made better progress since the last survey than Russia did -- and Russia's score from RWB alone is so far out of proportion to the rest of the G-8 that it clearly justifies booting Russia out of the group, as John McCain has properly suggested should be done.

What we see is Russia, just as in Soviet times, cutting itself off from all alternative sources of information, living more and more in a bubble cut off from reality, unable to see its own faults, unable to reform, doomed to be brought down by its own insularity. It's inexcusable, outrageous, barbaric for Russians to make exactly the same mistake twice.


Anonymous said...

Yet they like to fool us with their press ie: the "fears" that Putin may be a target when visiting Iran. Should we really feel bad for that man in any way?

Artfldgr said...

The insularity becomes necessary when the state uses black propaganda. The more propaganda deviates from the truth, the more is used to maintain it. eventually though, the economic, ideological truth starts to leak, and the more extreme forms of control start coming out since the natural response to protect oneself is to no longer listen, and since the orders have to be listened to be followed, you have a bad situation.

here is an early lesson from a master (with a big mouth. be more afraid of that which you dont read).

"Some kind of idea is at the beginning of every political movement. It is not necessary to put this idea in a thick book, nor that it take political form in a hundred long paragraphs. History proves that the greatest world movements have always developed when their leaders knew how to unify their followers under a short, clear theme."

the truthfulness of the theme need not be real, just reinforced. how else could you turn Fatherhood into the Demon in the home?

how else could you convince people to murder their neighbors?

or to sit still as each are plucked like vegetables and added to the shredder (gulags)?

So the Germans made the jews villains.

the feminists make men the villians.

the communists make capitalists the villians.


the next stage is how a small premise - equality - then snoballs into bizarro world outcomes...

One then builds a whole system of thought on such a brief, crisply formulated idea. The idea does not remain limited to this single statement, rather it is applied to every aspect of daily life and becomes the guide for all human activity — politics, culture, the economy, every area of human behavior. It becomes a worldview. We see that in all great revolutionary movements, which begin with a clear, crisp, understandable, all-encompassing idea. They spread more and more and become a mirror of life that reflects all activities of the peoples, and indeed in a particular way.

so this is how it works and this is how the people inside (the useful idiots) know which way to march.

the germans made NAZIsm its world veiw, and the simple premise was. "we are better than everyone else".

guess what? if you collect the few premises of that group, you can now see how that SAME set are used in anotehr group with the same totalitarian radical ends! (there are lots of them, feminists are the easiest one to use since they are the MOST dominant form of fascistic control and the ones that will make the change here. all from the small idea in lsysistrada)

So feminism is incorporated into a "world view", even larussophobes site promotes the world view!!!

the view is a simple idea that changes a little to suit the thing it wants to pry up.

todays message is contradictory... we are all the same, except when women are superior, and men are inferior.

from that and a few other simple messages, in the same way that lots of candy bars are made to get more people to eat sugar.

so they have this world view that men are the oppressors, and so responsible for all the ills, and therefore are the "enemy within"

replace the world men with jews, blacks, etc. the only difference is that in each embodyment they get cleverer and cleverer getting you to swallow the poison.

in the case of western women, its designed to appeal to their endless vanity, selfishness, and envy..

women are superioe, they are entitiles to be more equal, no one is allowed to have more than they.

vanity, selfishness, and envy

[note that envy is a jealousness that says if i cant have it, no one can]

the next stage for the person crafting this for the GULLIBLE group to be taken in by. in germany the gullible group were those who had little after the first wars deprivations and looking over to merchants who were able to recover faster.

to the peoples of the soviet union, the message was that those that had more cheat, and so take it from them. for if you cant ahve it, no one can.

the messages are the same over and over and over... and because they are recasted another different target group is picked to be the group that damns them all. Marx said that women were the EASIEST group to do this to!

Then one can say that a person has a worldview—not because he knows a lot or has read a lot—but because he sees all of life from a certain standpoint, and measures everything by a certain standard. I am a Christian when I believe that the meaning of my life is the heavy responsibility to love my neighbor as myself. Kant once said: "Act as if the principle of your life could be the principle for your entire nation." I am a National Socialist not when I want this or that from politics, rather when I consider all aspects of daily life. I must act in all things by putting the good of the whole above my personal good, by putting the good of the state above my personal good.

you can replace national socialism up there with feminism, communism, and on and on..

read the Quotes of the leaders.. they couldnt say what they say unless they too adopted this "world view" like the leaders of the Nazi movment, the socialist movment, the feminist movment.

i have already beat a dead horse with kathrine mckinnons quote that all three are the same! and that that is feminisms goal for the west. (which is why communist states dont promote feminism, even though they lie to the leaders. so its propaganda of one group, on the top level, creating nother group lower down that embodies the world view, that then visits it upon the rest of the population. and when it resonates with how people FEEL, not think, they ahve a winner)

"[S]he sees all of life from a certain standpoint, and measures everything by a certain standard"

thats why they dont make sense to those that think about what they are really promoting, and those that question their orthodoxy.

its a myth under construction, and truth can tear a myth apart before it has time to set. today the myth has set, we cant believe that there were any good men. that all those rockwell paintings were propagandic lies. for what else is the truth when propaganda replaces it? (which is why anyone that tries to say the truth, and give real numbers, is a sore loser, who drums up the highest vitriol. In the case of jews, is a person who wants to preserve their right to steal.. in the case of mra's(men) its because they want to preserve their right to rape and abuse. in the case of politics its the fascist right that wants to preserve hegomony (as if the new group will not do that once they topple the old hegemony using others to do it))

lets see the clearest western examples of propaganda in action.

"I haven't the faintest notion what possible revolutionary role white hetero-sexual men could fulfill, since they are the very embodiment of reactionary-vested-interest-power. But then, I have great difficulty examining what men in general could possibly do about all this. In addition to doing the shitwork that women have been doing for generations, possibly not exist? No, I really don't mean that. Yes, I really do." -- Robin Morgan

could you replace man with jew and see this from a nazi? of course you can, since the assertions are not from a rational truthful thing, but from a radical program to unseat the current system (captialism) and create the system that they believe will give them what they want (communism). they even SAY so... so the assertion isnt a conclusion of mine, its a quote from them.

lets see other things that cmoe from a propagandic world view.


[any more than the majority of germans hated jews, or majority of people actually hate blacks. most of the time, people are indifferent, not actively hating]

"Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage." - Sheila Cronin, the leader of the feminist organization NOW

"Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's bodies." - Andrea Dworkin

"The institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist" - Ti-Grace Atkinson

"Feminism is the theory, lesbianism is the practice." - Ti-Grace Atkinson

"In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent." -- Catherine MacKinnon, quoted in Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies.

"And if the professional rapist is to be separated from the average dominant heterosexual (male), it may be mainly a quantitative difference." -- Susan Griffin, Rape: The All-American Crime.

"All men are rapists and that's all they are" -- Marilyn French, Authoress; (later, advisoress to Al Gore's Presidential Campaign.)

here is one that is taking the propaganda revisionism (stalinism) of the past, and projecting it forward, wanting the outcome for her own, the way she believes the past was like (exactly like today, except men were professionally mean).

"I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He's just incapable of it." -- Barbara Jordan, former congresswoman

let me know if that isnt the same concept that the nazis embodies. we are superior, and we will tell you, and we will abolish the inferior.

"If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males." --Mary Daly, former Professor at Boston College, 2001.

"The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." -- Sally Miller Gearhart, in The Future - If There Is One - Is Female.

and just as the speech above says to politicize life, thats what the feminsits have done promoting that "the private is now public", etc.

Catharine MacKinnon maintains that "the private is a sphere of battery, marital rape and women's exploited labor." In this way, privacy and family are reduced to nothing more than aspects of the master plan, which is male domination. Democratic freedoms and the need to keep the state's nose out of our personal affairs are rendered meaningless. The real reason our society cherishes privacy is because men have invented it as an excuse to conceal their criminality. If people still insist that the traditional family is about love and mutual aid--ideals which, admittedly, are sometimes betrayed--they're "hiding from the truth." The family isn't a place where battery and marital rape sometimes happen but where little else apparently does. Sick men don't simply molest their daughters, they operate in league with their wives to "breed" them for that purpose. -- Donna Laframboise; The Princess at the Window (in a critical explication of the Catharine MacKinnon, Gloria Steinhem et al, tenets of misandric belief.)

and the way they succeed is that every person ahs their own personal versions!!!!

so most feminists dont share that view, but they do call themselves veminists. however they dont note hta they are standing on two different plains. the personal versions plain is the masses, and each individuals reason is irrelevent as they cant interview them all. and so the higher plain, these wackaloons, are the ones that dicktat the outcome.. all the while showing others of pwoer how much they ahve because they gathered so many under their banner on their field of battle.

"Overthrowing capitalism is too small for us. We must overthrow the whole...patriarch!" -- Gloria Steinem, radical feminist leader, editor of Ms. Magazine.

"In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from families and communally raise them" -- Dr. Mary Jo Bane, feminist and assistant professor of education at Wellesley College, and associate director of the school's Center for Research on Woman.

their whole program is the asme progam as lennin, and hitler, and mao, and such.

the reason is that this is the only program that can unseat the hegemony of a just state!!!

MALE: ... represents a variant of or deviation from the category of female. The first males were mutants...the male sex represents a degeneration and deformity of the female. From 'A feminist Dictionary; ed. Kramarae and Triechler, Pandora Press, 1985

and the dead horse"
“Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, and Socialist/Communist government is the goal of feminism.” - Catharine A. MacKinnon

here is a quote.. which one is the real one?

example 1:
I am a Feminist when I see everything in politics, culture or the economy from this standpoint. I therefore do not evaluate the theater from the standpoint of whether it is elegant or amusing, rather I ask: Is it good for Women, is it useful for them, does it strengthen the community? If so, the community in turn can benefit, support and strengthen me. I do not see the economy as some sort of way of making money, rather I want an economy that will strengthen the people, make them healthy and powerful. Then too I can expect that this people will support and maintain me. If I see things in this way, I see the economy in Feminist terms.

example 2:
I am a National Socialist when I see everything in politics, culture or the economy from this standpoint. I therefore do not evaluate the theater from the standpoint of whether it is elegant or amusing, rather I ask: Is it good for my people, is it useful for them, does it strengthen the community? If so, the community in turn can benefit, support and strengthen me. I do not see the economy as some sort of way of making money, rather I want an economy that will strengthen the people, make them healthy and powerful. Then too I can expect that this people will support and maintain me. If I see things in this way, I see the economy in National Socialist terms.

As an idea develops into a worldview, the goal is the state. The knowledge does not remain the property of a certain group, but fights for power. It is not just the fantasy of a few people among the people, rather it becomes the idea of the rulers, the circles that have power. The view does not only preach, but it is carried out in practice. Then the idea becomes the worldview of the state. The worldview has become a government organism when it seizes power and can influence life not only in theory, but in practical everyday life.

and so now in 40 years time, feminism is the world view of the american state, the west, and is now proceeding onward.. and unlike nazism, and totalitarian communism, they are moving to do the whole thing by vote.

remember, it was women in germany who just got the vote, that voted hitler into office on a ticket of prosperity and safety, and a bright future for their children..

isnt that the same line that the other groups use? just casted to their specific audience (which in the case of women they ahve a direct line to through the feminist dominated womens mags funded by big tobacco, liquor and other fascist corporations that need state control to maintain THEIR hegemony)

in the soviet union, you couldnt question the real leaders actions.

in germany, you couldnt question the real leaders actions.

in the west, you cant question the real leaders actions. the poltiicos dont lead they are proxies. and so the most dominant organize polilticl group that people believe is the largest ends up running things. everyone believes that most women if not feminsit, blindly support feminism. since men dont actually have an organizes patriarchy (its a myth, as the myth of the jews, and the bougousie), they end up dominating poltiics. what other PC (allowed) group is as large as half the population plus male sympathizers?

[which is why we have such horrible homelives now. one could not imagine norman rockwell painting family images today. he probably would make a chocolate jesus. the worst the homelives get, the more that they can blame the men. just as the worst things got in germany, the more they blamed the jews. and just as in russia, they blamed capitalists, etc. (they had a longer list, they have been around 100 years doing killing this way. they are the experts of all time!)]

Now we must consider who is the carrier, the transmitter, the guardian of such ideas. An idea always lives in individuals. It seeks an individual to transmit its great intellectual force. It becomes alive in a brain, and seeks escape through the mouth. The idea is preached by individuals, individuals who will never be satisfied to have the knowledge remain theirs alone. You know that from experience. When one knows something one does not keep it hidden like a buried treasure, but rather one seeks to tell others. One looks for people who should know it. One feels that everyone else should know as well, for one feels alone when no one else knows.

For example, if I see a beautiful painting in an art gallery, I have the need to tell others. I meet a good friend and say to him: "I have found a wonderful picture. I have to show it to you." The same is true of ideas. If an idea lives in an individual, he has the urge to tell others. There is some mysterious force in us that drives us to tell others.
The greater and simpler the idea is, the more it relates to daily life, the more one has the desire to tell everyone about it.

If I believe that the nation must be governed by the principle that the common good comes before the individual good, I will tell it to those to whom it applies. As soon as I realize that this principle is not only of a transcendental nature, but that it applies to daily life, I have the need to tell it to those in the economic world. And if I see it applies to culture as well, I have the need to tell it to those people involved in cultural activities.

The great masses will never be won simply by such a sentence; it must cast its shadow over all areas of human life.

You see how an idea spreads and becomes a worldview, and how the bearer, the individual, reaches out to form a community, and how an organization, then a movement grows from the individual. The idea is no longer buried in the heart and mind of an individual. Now there are four, five, ten, twenty, thirty, fifty, eighty, a hundred, and ever more. That is the secret of ideas; they are like a wildfire that cannot be restrained. They are like a gas that seeps through everything. Where an idea finds entry, it enters, and soon that person is influencing others. The others cannot stop it.

They may believe they can stop the fire by force. They may even be able to do so for two, or ten, twenty, or fifty years. But that is not significant in the larger course of world history. It is irrelevant if something happens today or tomorrow, or even years in the future.

of course, we dont study this.. we dont study a lot of things like this because those who play this game dont want it to be a focus. the only reason we can read it and learn is that we are still free. after all putin is telling the population his truth as to stalin, and the germans are telling the truth as they believe about the jews, and feminsit women beleive that they are telling the truth about the real nature of men.

whats not to understand?

Ideology is not the same as IDEAS.