La Russophobe has moved!

You should be automatically redirected in 6 seconds. If not, visit
http://larussophobe.wordpress.com
and update your bookmarks.

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Russians Find Dictatorship and Mass Murder Oh-So Stylish

The New York Times reports:

Empowered by an oil boom that pushed the country’s trade surplus past $94 billion this year, Russia has been flexing its muscles abroad. At home, meanwhile, young and trendy Muscovites are in the throes of nostalgia for the staples of Soviet childhoods, relics of a time when the U.S.S.R. was at the height of superpower status.

That may explain why one of the most popular fashion designers this fall is Denis Simachev, who is selling overcoats fastened with hammer-and-sickle buttons, gold jewelry minted to look like Soviet kopecks and shirts festooned with the Soviet coat of arms, complete with embroidered ears of wheat.

“People in their 30s see these kinds of symbols as reminders of happy memories, like going to pioneer camp where they lived together, ate breakfast together and played sports,” said Mr. Simachev, 33, who wears his hair in a Samurai-style ponytail. He insists he is no Communist — for one thing, his overcoats sell for about $2,100 and his T-shirts for about $600. His boutique is sandwiched between Hermès and Burberry stores on a pedestrian lane, Stoleshnikov, that is one of the capital’s most expensive shopping streets.

Mr. Simachev first attracted notice with a collection of retro Olympic tracksuits emblazoned with C.C.C.P., the Cyrillic initials for the U.S.S.R., and T-shirts printed with the likeness of President Vladimir V. Putin, which served as a wink at the cult of personality forming around the leader.

By tapping into a generation that is experiencing an identity crisis, Mr. Simachev, who is also known here as a D. J., a Ducati motorcycle rider and a snowboarder, has quickly become the epitome of Russian cool for a subset of gilded Moscow youth. They throng the pub underneath his store for lunch and on weekend evenings when it transforms into a nightclub.

Victoria Tirovskaya, 24, says she wears the designer’s clothes because they are chic and a bit audacious. “I have a classic blouse and shorts from Simachev but I also have a U.S.S.R. sweatshirt,” Ms. Tirovskaya, an interior designer, said. “Before Simachev, nobody dared to use the symbol of our country as a fashion icon.”

The designer’s rise as the commissar of Soviet kitsch neatly dovetails with Russia’s current embrace of retrograde politics and resurgent nationalism. A billboard just off Red Square advertises the results of the parliamentary elections, scheduled for early December, as if they were a fait accompli: “Moscow votes for Putin!”

After more than a decade of Westernization, in which international brands have flooded the Russian market and the Russian elite have taken to wearing designers from Valentino to Louis Vuitton, a “Back to the U.S.S.R.” movement among consumers seems a logical step, some social observers here say.

“At first, the people of my generation wanted to try those things that our parents could not, but now that we have seen everywhere, we are coming back to our roots,” said Evelina Khromtchenko, the editor in chief of the Russian edition of L’Officiel, a French fashion magazine.

Mr. Simachev has developed a swaggering fashion lexicon typified in his men’s wear by fur hats, fur boots, jackets with muscular shoulders and slim-hipped, low-slung trousers. “We are from Russia, from the former Soviet Union,” he said. “It’s what I know about, it’s what inspires me, and now, after years of Russians trying to live a Western lifestyle and forget they are Russian, other people are getting it.”

Unlike the Americana of Ralph Lauren, with his easeful style informed by the Ivy League, Mr. Simachev’s evocation of motherland style often provocatively incorporates jingoistic elements. In the past four years, he has designed collections inspired by the war in Chechnya, the boycotted 1980 Moscow Olympics, the Soviet Navy and, this season, Moscow criminal gangs of the 1990s.

Critics have interpreted his collections as endorsements of, or protests against, past and current regimes. But Mr. Simachev described himself as apolitical. “I am a mirror for what is going on around me,” he said.

He added: “Nobody wants to go back to Communism. But it had certain attributes and symbols which for younger people are not associated with the regime, but with our own personal memories.”

Russians more steeped in Soviet history say they are appalled at the merchandising of the symbols of totalitarianism. “Personally, I would never wear something by Denis Simachev because, for me, those symbols mean Stalinist terror, Communism, a K.G.B. spy system and the cold war,” said Alexandre Vassiliev, a fashion historian who has published 14 books here. “I disapprove completely.”

The designer’s fans say his motives are purely commercial. “Why did Andy Warhol paint Mao Zedong or Lenin? Because they are easily recognizable symbols,” said Nicolas Iljine, who specializes in Russian-American cultural exchange for the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation. “This is all pop nostalgia in a light-handed way. It doesn’t have deeper meaning.”

Mr. Simachev’s fashions are reminiscent of the tongue-in-cheek use of Mao references by the Hong Kong retailer David Tang, who sold his versions of retro Communist kitsch in the late ’90s, just as China was embracing the global capitalist economy.

For now, the Simachev label appears to be attracting more attention than revenue. With Russians earning an average of about $550 a month, few can afford Mr. Simachev’s wares. The designer’s clothes sell at about 30 multibrand boutiques in Russia and about 15 stores abroad, said Anna Dyulgerova, the development director of the brand.

The investors behind the label are two Moscow businessmen, Vadim and Vyacheslav Aminov, who declined to reveal annual sales or the size of their share in the company. Vadim Aminov, 38, said the two hope to make Simachev the first Russian brand to win worldwide recognition. Mr. Simachev already shows his men’s wear collections on the runways of Milan. His Web site, www.denissimachev.ru, is in English.

Vyacheslav Aminov, 48, said the brand was famous enough that it attracted imitators. “When I was on the beach in Sardinia, I saw hawkers selling fake Simachev T-shirts,” he said. “I am sure that Simachev is the only Russian designer who has knockoffs.”

1 comment:

Artfldgr said...

He added: “Nobody wants to go back to Communism. But it had certain attributes and symbols which for younger people are not associated with the regime, but with our own personal memories.”

I can think of several people who would disagree with this statement. HOWEVER if it contains a play on words, then those who want to go back are nobodies.

This is an important thing that he is brigning up… the same ‘effect’ is in the west with the baby boomers and their children… growing up during the 60s revolution was romanticized before it was even half over… and so you can see, just as in the 70s the 50s were popular (happy days, etc)…

However the “cultural mash up” that is now, seeks to grab on to scraps of the past to establish some present state… there is no new ‘safe’ thing, just scraps of old that are ‘safe’ because they seem impotent, and important at the same time.

And because to the young symbols only mean what they personally think they mean, they have personal versions of things.

This allows for some interesting effects as I described a while back.


The designer’s fans say his motives are purely commercial. “Why did Andy Warhol paint Mao Zedong or Lenin? Because they are easily recognizable symbols,”

Ok… then why are they only using soviet era symbols? Why not symbols from the tatars, and from the US, and from all over…

While he focuses you down to some small thing to push out the rest of the world (Warhol mixed up all his symbols, he didn’t focus the way this person is)

This is whats hoped to be a reletivation, however, one would also have to ask, what was warhols political leanings and what was his friends points.

They were almost all serious leftists and such… they were not just commercial people. ESPECIALLY Warhol who left commercial and advertising art for the fine art world. (and who helped change the face of art from the uplifting of the renaissaince to the abstract expressionism and such? and why? read adorno and such on music and primitivization. This is why we have piss cross, and not something even higher and such than the most treasured works of mans history in totem!)


Well he may show them at Milan, but he doesn’t show them in ny… not yet. Fashion week in ny will be in feb…

However one only needs to know that one of the most important fashion groups is called “peoples revolution”. The industry is dominated by leftist women and feminist harridens taking advantage of the models and such to build their careers.

[after all, look at the red dress thing. it was the feminist fashion rags that got in with tobacco and alcohol to get going as redbook and ladies home journal (now being filled by Martha stewart), refused to run their ads because their products were harmful. Well, you came a long way baby, and so these rags go to pump in their leftist and communist stuff to the women and play them like fools. After all, the reason the magazines couldn’t get startes is that they hated the fashion industry.. they still do. however they are power oriented not morals oriented, so doubling back for power is not a problem. so the red dress now collects mony to figth gainst heard desease and such and is being promoted by the very same group of women. not just in ideology, but the actual same women from that time! so they got em sick, and now they are curing them. however both times they got power. power for the money and addicting women for the big companies… and power later for having a cause to fix the problem. sounds so soviet, no? ]


So he has no real problem showing up and having a show in ny either, since it’s a huge nest full of fellow travelers, red diaper babies, useful idiots by the score, and those who just don’t want to be on the ‘wrong side’ to everyone in their little world.