Aehrenfeld, Brunnental, Alt Dönhof, Frank, Herzog, Josefstal, Nichnaja Dobrinka, Norka, Obermunjou, Preuss, Saratov, Schönchen, Straub, and Yost...

are all names of churches destroyed by the communists.

they generally have no love of these symbols of nationalism, and such
(kind of dangerous to the kind of leadership they provide).
they dont want culture... and in general, if you read enough of the works,
you figure out that they are looking for homogenizing the lower population
(like horses, and cows, cats and such. more alike than not). however the elite
who "take care of them" and "provide for them", dont homogenize that way as they
create dynasties, in which the children they have are guaranteed to do ok (and
not be threatened by a population that has, as adorno said been "forced retarded").

in a way it makes sense, only what they think is important as they are the anointed that know whats best for the
pets in their charge (and who wants a sentimental cat).

laws of a state do not easily get undermined. think about it, this type of thing happens only in certain areas.
even in the west. what it amounts to is that the state no longer wishes to have those laws, and since they cant remove
them without notice, they cause them to not be acted on.

the blame though is not foisted on the state, but onto the people that are said to undermine the law.

in immigration in the US its rampant... but in most other areas,
its not really that possible, its prosecuted if found.

so the reason i said its the communist/soviet leadership is that the need to remind a
state to do what it is supposed to do as if parts of it go numb, is ridiculous.

however it allows there to be things to stop the blame from reaching the proper place if thats the way they play it.

look how it operates, its classical... first its the people who undermine... but if you think a bit, they have to be allowed. so the blame goes up only one notch.
then you say well they are being allowed so it must be the worker that allows them. but if you think about it, that makes no sense on a broader scale than one or two... so the blame goes up only one notch.
then you say well its the administrator. but that makes no sense since they are coming in and being paid to do a job, and if they are not doing it, then it must be the lack of the boss caring, or the boss is ordering them.

the point is that as you work this up the chain, you realize its policy and their method of getting what they want by sidestepping the population.
and if the population is not side stepped, then the waves can only wash up so far.. but the general public is not usually smart enough to work their way up the ladder.
even if they do, doing so puts them in a uncomfortable ethics position, that can be aleviated by not asking.



so if the leadership doesnt care or wants an outcome, it happens most of the time...
thinking that people undermine it, and its not known, and such is a false view, and has them chasing the wrong people.