tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25230932.post7057301366667343228..comments2023-10-06T10:10:06.982-04:00Comments on La Russophobe: Update on LitvinenkoLa Russophobehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05672264388217953086noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25230932.post-30872025505787001392007-02-26T10:52:00.000-05:002007-02-26T10:52:00.000-05:00MARK:Yes, we reported on it here:http://russophobe...MARK:<BR/><BR/>Yes, we reported on it here:<BR/><BR/>http://russophobe.blogspot.com/2007/02/update-on-svetlichnaya.htmlLa Russophobehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05672264388217953086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25230932.post-26937602568160746822007-02-26T09:35:00.000-05:002007-02-26T09:35:00.000-05:00Have you seen Sunday Times apology?Sunday Times, 1...Have you seen Sunday Times apology?<BR/>Sunday Times, 18 February 2007<BR/><BR/>“We are happy to make it clear that Ms Svetlichnaja has never worked for a state-owned Russian company and we accept that she was not part of any Kremlin-inspired campaign to discredit Mr Litvinenko. We apologise for any distress our report caused her.”<BR/><BR/>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1400785.eceAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25230932.post-31221942858240012442007-02-16T06:44:00.000-05:002007-02-16T06:44:00.000-05:00A note to the person who tried to comment on this ...A note to the person who tried to comment on this post:<BR/><BR/>(a) We told you not to call yourself anonymous.<BR/><BR/>(b) We told you not to engage in personal abuse of anyone other than La Russophobe.<BR/><BR/>Your comment will not be published unless you rectify these issues.<BR/><BR/>We might also advise that if you want to be taken seriously you make some vague attempt to source your claims. Your own word is, to say the least, not quite convincing.La Russophobehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05672264388217953086noreply@blogger.com