tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25230932.post661082077961566261..comments2023-10-06T10:10:06.982-04:00Comments on La Russophobe: EDITORIAL: Georgia is BurningLa Russophobehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05672264388217953086noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25230932.post-15522895004476652622007-11-13T18:18:00.000-05:002007-11-13T18:18:00.000-05:00I am Russian and it amazes me sometimes the foolis...I am Russian and it amazes me sometimes the foolish things that come out of united state about my country that are not even close to accurate. This makes me believe that american is become a Nazi state so very fast to produce such brainwashed uneducated people who cant critical think for them selfs and actually learn about something.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25230932.post-23607375228475005572007-11-13T08:45:00.000-05:002007-11-13T08:45:00.000-05:00Hitler did have chemical weapons, but even he did ...Hitler did have chemical weapons, but even he did not dare use them in battle. <BR/><BR/>As to the "size of NATO", I don' think incorporation of such members as Rumania or Estonia made this alliance any stronger. They switched side in global conflicts before - once a traitor, always a traitor. <BR/><BR/>And finally, about your mantra of "Russia destroying itself". Let me remind you an ancient Oriental wisdom: <I>"No matter how many times you repeat the word "halva", your mouth isn't going to feel any sweeter."</I>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25230932.post-720262459927262962007-11-13T06:06:00.000-05:002007-11-13T06:06:00.000-05:00Correct us if we're wrong, but we don't think Napo...Correct us if we're wrong, but we don't think Napoleon or Hitler had nuclear weapons, or an alliance the size of NATO.<BR/><BR/>But that's beside the point. Russia will be quite happy to destroy itself, just as the USSR did.<BR/><BR/>Imbecile.La Russophobehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05672264388217953086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25230932.post-27692372885605720122007-11-13T05:58:00.000-05:002007-11-13T05:58:00.000-05:00Invading Russia, my gracious lady? The hopeless co...Invading Russia, my gracious lady? The hopeless cowards populating the West today won't dream of trying to repeat this "mission" which Napoleon and Hitler tried - and failed, moreover that Russia is a nuclear state. As to the former satellite state of the Soviet Union, Russia did expect them to go their own way, but they became the slave states of the USA whose governments permit against the will of their citizens to deploy American missiles on their territory - within several minutes' flight-in time from Russia's vital centres.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25230932.post-28737099637648644082007-11-12T20:53:00.000-05:002007-11-12T20:53:00.000-05:00ANONYMOUS:We didn't write "cold war settlement" yo...ANONYMOUS:<BR/><BR/>We didn't write "cold war settlement" you hopeless idiot. That's a block quotation sourced to Robert Amsterdam.<BR/><BR/>However, we'll be happy to explain what is obvious to any turnip: The West stayed its hand when the USSR collapsed. It could have invaded and destroyed Russia easily. In return, it expected Russia to allow the slave states to go their own way.<BR/><BR/>Understand, you cretin?<BR/><BR/>The cold war isn't done away with, it's raging, as we point out daily on this blog. What planet are you on, if one may ask?<BR/><BR/>Please don't drink and post. It's quite annoying.La Russophobehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05672264388217953086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25230932.post-20656731085895343562007-11-12T20:39:00.000-05:002007-11-12T20:39:00.000-05:00What "cold war settlement" do you mean, Ma'am? Can...What "cold war settlement" do you mean, Ma'am? Can you refer to any "act of unconditional surrender" signed by the USSR, or, for that matter, the present-day Russian Federation? And if the cold war is done away with, why did the number of tanks deployed in the so-called "Baltic States" increase since 1999 by 431 (nearly tenfold) and the number of heavy artillery pieces, by 320 (nearly threefold)? (see the report presented by the Gen. Baluevsky, the head of the Russian GHQ, at the Duma meeting approving the moratorium on the CFE treaty)?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25230932.post-12975364076201126062007-11-12T11:17:00.000-05:002007-11-12T11:17:00.000-05:00Technically russia finding a pretext to move troop...Technically russia finding a pretext to move troops in would serve a lot of their goals. so if ways and means that create a state that appears to have validity (making things easier), doesnt pan out, then moving troops in will be the next thing. <BR/><BR/>it puts huge pressure on turkey and allows supply of weapons to the communist insurgents who have recently woken up and got noisy. <BR/><BR/>it puts russian troops near a potential combat area, and history shows america shys away from a situaiton were its too easy to orchestrate convenient accidents. <BR/><BR/>such a move might create basis for staying in power till the emergency is over. <BR/><BR/>and other goodies... <BR/><BR/>like reclaiming the birth place of stalin and bringing it back into the fold. after all, if stalin is to again be the peoples hero, then isnt it not so good that the place where he was from doesnt want anything to do with the coutnry that claims him hero?<BR/><BR/><B>the whole countries population is lessd than that of NY city!!!</B> (with a quarter of it in once city -tbilisi)<BR/><BR/>they only have 11,320 in their armed forces... <BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/>to anyone that studies tactics and strategy, its obvious that its location is whats important... it doesnt ahve a huge economy and population to exploit, it doesnt have a large army and such to buy weapons and such... it doesnt have huge untapped resources in exess of what the taker has. <BR/><BR/>as i said in another post. the ONLY crime of georgia is that its standing in the way of goals. <BR/><BR/>those goals are weapons and the ability to maintain instability. both end up making more money out of each unit of work than else. <BR/><BR/>after all, if everything was peacful there, then would we be paying 100 a barrel or more? if africa was more peaceful, how much oil and resources would then be available (and increased resources yeilds decresed prices). <BR/><BR/>contrary to them not having any idea of how capitalism works, they have a great idea of how it works, as their strategic choices all point to an understanding of it. <BR/><BR/>and so the bigger question then becomes, if so, then why do the people suffer? because they can hide their thefts and control behind the promise and concepts!!!<BR/><BR/>so they know clearly what the end result of their games will be... and so does shak the leader. whats worse is that the position he is in is that he is caught in <B>a war behind the scenes</B><BR/><BR/>the biggest secret of the cold war was that we are in a state of constant war in which the war is kept as hidden as possible from the general population so that they can fight and not suffer the depredations of war!!! <BR/><BR/>in that the outcomes will be the same except the prizes more valuable for being left whole (for the most part)... <BR/><BR/>so the old concept of moving in troops is not acceptable... unless there is no other way... the illusion of peace and that it fails is the constant story given... but if you look carefully, the parts they fight over and such are EXACTLY the same as if they were generals and to move troops in. <BR/><BR/>its a much more finessed game... <BR/><BR/>and once you realize that, you stop listening to the press and such, as their noise is for the purpose of obfuscating the war in front of them... (the panic to bury the iraq war is the panic that comes from the potential of having the public wake up and such. for if they did, then the ability to play this quiet war would be less, the productivity and such that continued on this way would end, and it would come to nasty blows as the group cant finesse)<BR/><BR/>georgia has to fall to take ajerbaijan and to preserve hegemony and a corridor to their money and destabalization requirements. <BR/><BR/>the people, the ideas, the reasons, everything else, is meaningless, as they are not even on the real table as some discussion point since the results are tallied in lives.Artfldgrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13594241837693535704noreply@blogger.com